Debt Financing and Firm Performance: Evidence from Cointegration Analysis

Authors: 
Rahji Ohize Ibrahim, Kamaldeen Ibraheem Nageri
DOI Number: 
http://doi.org/10.31039/jomeino.2020.4.3.5
Abstract: 
Erstwhile studies proved that debt can positively or negatively affect firm's performance. This study tests the long run and short run dynamic of debt on firm‘s performance in the context of the negative and positive effects. The panel cointegration model, fully modified Ordinary Least Square and error correction model were employed. The panel cointegration result indicates existence of long run relationship between debt and firm performance. 19.85% long run disequilibrium is corrected within a year while there is significant short run relationship between debt and return on investment. In the same vein, 1.52% long run disequilibrium is corrected within a year while there is significant short run relationship between debt and return on assets. This implies that the use of debt on investment and asset, should be properly scrutinise within the fine line of investment and asset to determine optimal use.
Keywords: 
Debt, Firm Performance, Panel Data, Cointegration, Long-run, Short-run.
Full Text: 
File download
References: 

Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438-445.

Abor, J. (2007). Debt policy and performance of SMEs: Evidence from Ghanaian and South African firms. Journal of Risk Finance, 8(4), 364-379.

Akingunola, R. O., Olawale, L. S. & Olaniyan, J. D. (2017). Capital structure decision and firm performance: Evidence from non-financial firms in Nigeria. Acta Universitatis Danubius Œconomica, 13(6), 351-364.

Bandyopadhyay, A & Barua, N. M. (2016). Factors determining capital structure and corporate performance in India: Studying the business cycle effects. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 61(c), 160-172.

Bokhtiar, H., Mainul, A. F, Afzalur, R. & Nurul, A. (2014). Influence of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 1883 -3850.

Donaldson, G. (1961). Corporate debt capacity: A study of corporate debt capacity. Division of Research, Harvard School of Business Administration, Boston.

Ebaid, E. I. (2009). The impact of capital-structure choice on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Risk Finance, 10(5), 477-487.

Kirimi, P. N., Simiyu, J. & Dennis, M. (2017). Effect of debt finance on financial performance of savings and credit cooperative societies in Maara Sub-county, Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 2(3), 113-130.

Lemma, T. T. & Negash, M. (2014). Determinants of the adjustment speed of capital structure: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 15(1), 64-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2012-0023

Lin, C., Ma, Y., Malatesta, P. & Xuan, Y. (2013). Corporate ownership structure and the choice between bank debt and public debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(2), 517-534.

Majumdar, S. K. & Chhibber, P. (1999). Capital structure and performance: Evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate governance. Public Choice, 98(3–4), 287-305.

Majumdar, S. K. & Sen, K. (2010). Debt in the Indian corporate sector: Its effects on firm strategy and performance. Decision, 37(3), 30-47.

Mesquita, J. M. C. & Lara, J. E. (2003). Capital structure and profitability: The Brazilian case. Academy of Business and Administration Sciences Conference, 11-13 Vancouver.

Mubeen, M. & Kalsoom, A. (2014). Impact of capital structure on firms’ financial performance and shareholders wealth: Textile sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(12), 2164-4063.

Myers, S & Majluf, N (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.

Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(3), 799–819.

Mykhailo, I. (2013). The Impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Ukraine. A thesis submitted to Kyiv School of Economist.

Nirajini, A. & Priya, K. B. (2013). Impact of capital structure on financial performance of the listed trading companies in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(5), 2250 – 3153.

Nwude, E. C., Itiri, I. O., Agbadua, B. O. & Udeh, S. N. (2016). The impact of debt structure on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Nigerian quoted firms. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(11), 647-660.

Oino, I & Ukaegbu, B. (2015). The impact of profitability on capital structure and speed of adjustment: An empirical examination of selected firms in Nigeria stock exchange. Research in International Business and Finance, 35(c), 111-121.

Omollo, B. A., Muturi, W. M. & Dr. Wanjare, J. (2018). Effect of debt financing options on financial performance of firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(10), 150-164.

Onaolapo, A. A. & Kajola, S.O. (2010). Capital structure and firms‘ performance: The Nigerian experience. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 25, 72-74.

Ramadan, Z., Ramadan, S. & Zeyad, I. (2015). Capital structure and firm’s performance of Jordanian manufacturing sector. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(6), 279-284.

Salim, M. & Yadav, R. (2012). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 156-166.

Simerly, R. L. & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure, and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31-49.

Varun, D. (2014). Agency theory, capital structure and firm performance: Some Indian evidences. Managerial Finance, 40(12), 1190-1206.

Yazdanfar, D. & Öhman, P. (2015). Debt financing and firm performance: An empirical study based on Swedish data. The Journal of Risk Finance, 16(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0085.

 

Page: 
75-88.
Content Status: 
Published