Closed Loop Supply Chain Network with LCC

Authors: 
Elkhan Hasanov, Parviz Hasanov, Yadullah Babayev
DOI Number: 
doi.org/10.31039/jomeino.2018.2.1.2
Abstract: 
Economic growth increases production and result of this increased consumption and waste. Considering the amount of waste generated every year the managing of waste is quickly becoming a tremendous problem for the environment. Thus manufacturers and the general public have come to recognize the importance of waste management. The aim of the paper is to revisit an EOQ type reverse logistics model Ritcher (1996a,b) and highlights the potential benefits of developing recycle methodology in the manufacture and remanufacture. Figures and mathematical models are developed and results investigated with examples. The developed model was compared with the model of Ritcher (1996a,b) to stress the importance of waste management.
Keywords: 
Supply Chain, Logistics, Recycle Methodology
Full Text: 
File download
References: 

King, A. M., Burgess, S. C., Ijomah, W., & McMahon, C. A. (2006). Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle?. Sustainable Development, 14(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.271
Baetz, B. W., & Neebe, A. W. (1994). A planning model for the development of waste material recycling programmes. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(12), 1374-1384. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.214
Curlee, T. R. (1986). Plastics recycling: Economic and institutional issues. Conservation & Recycling, 9(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3658(86)90068-8
Dobos, I., & Richter, K. (2003). A production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 11 (1), 35–46.
Dobos, I., & Richter, K. (2004). An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(3), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.09.007
Dobos, I., & Richter, K. (2006). A production/recycling model with quality consideration. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006
Richter, K. (1996). The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00276-6
Richter, K. (1996). The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model. International Journal of Production Economics, 45(1-3), 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00143-3
Staikos, T., & Rahimifard, S. (2007). An end-of-life decision support tool for product recovery considerations in the footwear industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(6), 602-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920701416549
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Weib, M. (1999) Recycling alter schuhe, Schuh-Technik, 26–29.
Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M. Z., & Alting, L. (1997). Environmental assessment of products, Volume 1. Methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman & Hall.
Wilson, M., Abbot, S., & Tame, R. (1997). Moulded-on Solings. Modern shoemaking, 53, 1-26.
Woolridge, A. C., Ward, G. D., Phillips, P. S., Collins, M., & Gandy, S. (2006). Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective. Resources, conservation and recycling, 46(1), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.006

Page: 
13-19
Issue: 
Volume 2, Number 1, January-April 2018
Content Status: 
Published